Difference between revisions of "Biohacking Code of Conduct"

From London Hackspace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reading links)
(Discussion)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
=Discussion=
 
=Discussion=
 
*GILDA: our representatives should be scientists and/or people who already have practical experience of biohacking. We shouldn't be represented by anyone who will talk about perceived or imagined problems.
 
*GILDA: our representatives should be scientists and/or people who already have practical experience of biohacking. We shouldn't be represented by anyone who will talk about perceived or imagined problems.
 +
 +
*BUGS: as a science-type-person, I'd be very interested in going along.

Revision as of 13:55, 7 April 2011

We have been invited to give our views on a possible DIYBio code of conduct. http://groups.google.com/group/london-hack-space/browse_thread/thread/e5f41cdda8b7146b/bbd26dcba4761a4b?lnk=gst&q=diybio#bbd26dcba4761a4b

This page is used to gather reading material and start a discussion.

Reading links


Notes

  • Cathy the Hackspace ethicist has offered her help.

Discussion

  • GILDA: our representatives should be scientists and/or people who already have practical experience of biohacking. We shouldn't be represented by anyone who will talk about perceived or imagined problems.
  • BUGS: as a science-type-person, I'd be very interested in going along.