1,496
edits
User:Martind: Difference between revisions
From London Hackspace Wiki
m
→Managing Growth
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
** or even panels (invited groups of newcomers) when discussing policy changes | ** or even panels (invited groups of newcomers) when discussing policy changes | ||
** of course that's hard to reconcile with our very informal approach to policy-making | ** of course that's hard to reconcile with our very informal approach to policy-making | ||
Atm there's an implicit assumption that the LHS is a space to practice a particular shared culture (hacker/maker/open source/sharing/...) As we grow more newcomers have not been exposed to this culture. (These are: short-term users, newcomers, purely self-interested users, ...) | |||
* I think there's great value in building safe teaching spaces to learn the culture; pledge drives and social nights work well I think, and I'm still hoping the Hack the Space Day will become more popular | |||
* but of course: can't expect that everyone *wants* to learn the culture. | |||
There's an open question in this: how do we want to handle with people who don't want to learn the culture? (Because they don't know better, haven't learned yet; or because they disagree/refuse) | |||
* do we still want to support them? | |||
* is our (limited) energy best spent on converting them? | |||
* are there systematic means of still letting them interact in productive ways, somehow channeling their self-interest into things that benefit the org? | |||
* when do they become a liability? | |||
== Spc Mgmt == | == Spc Mgmt == | ||
