Organisation/2016 EGM: Difference between revisions
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
The grievance procedure is not fit for purpose as it stands; it needs to be reviewed, and documented, it must satisfy the following requirements: | The grievance procedure is not fit for purpose as it stands; it needs to be reviewed, and documented, it must satisfy the following requirements: | ||
That time frames are set for when a complaint can be made (i.e. current events only) and relating to the response and actioning of it | * That time frames are set for when a complaint can be made (i.e. current events only) and relating to the response and actioning of it | ||
Satisfy “separation of duties” requirements from the main activities of the board | * Satisfy “separation of duties” requirements from the main activities of the board | ||
That the directors tasked with this role are changed on a periodic basis (not longer than 6 months) | * That the directors tasked with this role are changed on a periodic basis (not longer than 6 months) | ||
Have independent oversight by a professional person i.e. accountant, solicitor, etc. (and not a Director of LHS) to prevent the potential for abuse and maladministration | * Have independent oversight by a professional person i.e. accountant, solicitor, etc. (and not a Director of LHS) to prevent the potential for abuse and maladministration | ||
Have an appeals process | * Have an appeals process | ||
That complete and proper records are kept | * That complete and proper records are kept | ||
That this is added to the memorandum and articles of association as appropriate i.e. in the formal statutory documentation | * That this is added to the memorandum and articles of association as appropriate i.e. in the formal statutory documentation | ||
That no cases are progressed until these balances and processes are in place | That no cases are progressed until these balances and processes are in place | ||
Revision as of 11:14, 14 December 2015
A General Meeting of London Hackspace has been called by the membership under section 303 of the Companies Act 2006. This meeting will be held on Wednesday January 13th in the Classroom at London Hackspace. (The location and time is subject to change until the formal notice has been issued)
Formal notice of the meeting will be issued on Wednesday 16th of December, and motions for the meeting will be accepted up to that date by emailing the Chair at russ@london.hackspace.org.uk. Do not edit this page.
Agenda
Special Resolution 1
That Dean Forbes is removed as a member of London Hackspace..
Proposed by Thomas Greer. (A 75% majority is required to pass this resolution)
Resolution 2
That Dean Forbes is removed as a director of London Hackspace.
Proposed by Thomas Greer.
Special Resolution 3
That Thomas Greer should be banned as a member of the Hackspace. This ban should be reviewed by the Trustees annually.
Proposed by Tom Hodder. (A 75% majority is required to pass this resolution)
Special Resolution 4
Amend Article 23(b) as follows: "The number of directors shall be not less than three, nor more than twelve.”
Proposed by Tom Hodder. (A 75% majority is required to pass this resolution)
Special Resolution 5
Remove Article 31(b).
Proposed by Tom Hodder. (A 75% majority is required to pass this resolution)
Resolution 6
The grievance procedure is not fit for purpose as it stands; it needs to be reviewed, and documented, it must satisfy the following requirements:
- That time frames are set for when a complaint can be made (i.e. current events only) and relating to the response and actioning of it
- Satisfy “separation of duties” requirements from the main activities of the board
- That the directors tasked with this role are changed on a periodic basis (not longer than 6 months)
- Have independent oversight by a professional person i.e. accountant, solicitor, etc. (and not a Director of LHS) to prevent the potential for abuse and maladministration
- Have an appeals process
- That complete and proper records are kept
- That this is added to the memorandum and articles of association as appropriate i.e. in the formal statutory documentation
That no cases are progressed until these balances and processes are in place
Proposed by Sara Ensor
Special Resolution 7
That the attached amendments to the Articles of Association are adopted.
Proposed by Russ Garrett. (A 75% majority is required to pass this resolution.) This resolution will adopt the changes to the Articles as outlined in this pull request.
