Difference between revisions of "Equipment/Lovelace/Logbook"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(Dual monitors!) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | === 2012-03-08 === | ||
+ | Second monitor wasn't set up, added it to xorg.conf as a second X Screen (this will allow for disconnections w/o affecting Screen0). Noticed that attempting to restart X lead to it hitting 100% and hanging. Killed it, and kdm brought it up okay the next time & for a re-test. Should be okay on reboot (didn't test this). Gnome didn't handle a screen stretched across the two screens well (lacking Xinerama support?), which is why I went with the two-XScreen approach. The nouveau driver supports xrandr properly, so would be a better choice for frequent re-connections (at a cost of worse 3d support). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note: Why is it using kdm for gnome? Loading gtk and qt for login is expensive. | ||
+ | 15:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
=== 2011-11-16 Operator: Mark === | === 2011-11-16 Operator: Mark === | ||
Created logbook | Created logbook |
Revision as of 15:22, 8 March 2012
2012-03-08
Second monitor wasn't set up, added it to xorg.conf as a second X Screen (this will allow for disconnections w/o affecting Screen0). Noticed that attempting to restart X lead to it hitting 100% and hanging. Killed it, and kdm brought it up okay the next time & for a re-test. Should be okay on reboot (didn't test this). Gnome didn't handle a screen stretched across the two screens well (lacking Xinerama support?), which is why I went with the two-XScreen approach. The nouveau driver supports xrandr properly, so would be a better choice for frequent re-connections (at a cost of worse 3d support).
Note: Why is it using kdm for gnome? Loading gtk and qt for login is expensive. 15:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
2011-11-16 Operator: Mark
Created logbook