LBL06001
Risk Assessment Procedure for Lab Users Proposing New Projects
| Author: | Approved by: S. Thompson | SOP No. LBL06001 |
| Signed: | Signed: | Effective from: |
| Date: | Date: | Last edited: |
1. Purpose
The purpose of this SOP is to highlight the requirements to lab users starting new projects in the Biohackspace Laboratory in terms of the risks presented by undertaking such work. In particular, risks from the use of chemicals, reagents and equipment should be considered along with the important considerations that are essentially for working with genetically modified organisms.
2. Scope
This SOP applies to all users of the Biohackspace Laboratory and all projects undertaken within it.
3. Responsibilities
Ultimately, the laboratory user who initiates and undertakes the lab work (aka The Principal Investigator) is responsible for the health and safety considerations and containment requirements involved with their project. It is a requirement that they be aware of the risks involved in the project and the exposure to these risks by themselves, other lab users, the wider community and the environment. Before commencing any work the risks involved in the project must be assessed by the the principal investigator, they must seek advice from an experienced third party and the satisfactory results of this process must be signed off by the Biological Safety Officer.
4. Materials
i) Risk assessment checklist.
ii) List of materials and methods for project work.
5. Related documents
See also general lab induction LBL02001 based on initial lab risk assessment and other SOPs describing the best practice in terms of materials and methods to be used.
6. Definitions
GMM - Genetically Modified Microorganism
GMO - Genetically Modified Organism
COSHH - Control of Substances Hazardous to Health
SOP - Standard Operating Procedure
HG - Hazard Group
CL - Containment Level
PI - Principal Investigator
PPE - Personal Protective Equipment
MSDS - Material Safety Data Sheet
7. Procedures
7.1 Items for principal investigator to consider in assessing the risks in projects involving GMM.
7.1.1. Consider the potential hazardous properties from your microorganism cross referenced to national categorisation lists,
e.g Approved list of biological agents.
7.1.1.1 Any microorganisms to be used within the lab must fall within the Hazard Group 1 (HG1) category. Biological agents are categorised
into HG categories based on the following criteria:
i) are they harmful to human health?
ii) are they a hazard to employees/workers within the organisation?
iii) transmissible to the community?
iv) whether effective treatment and/or prophylaxis (including vaccines) are available?
7.1.2 The PI should condsider how the microorganism is being modified (in the case of GMMs),
e.g are there enhancements of function, altered tropisms and/or altered routes of transmission?
Consideration should be given to impacts on its hazardous properties i.e more pathogenic, attenuated or unchanged.
7.1.3 In handling the organism the PI should consider any risks involved, for example what PPE will be required? What risks are involved in
setting up and running fermentation and growth systems, for example. Particularly, are any non-standard procedures involved?
7.1.4 The PI should consider any special requirements in disposing of the microorganisms, in particular, cultures should be destroyed in the
kill bin and any GM material should be autoclaved as well before disposal to ensure destruction.
7.1.5 The PI should consider the storage requirements for the organism, such as whether the organism will be stored frozen, in the fridge
and/or at room temperature and if it requires any other special storage requirements.
7.1.6 Important: If the micro organism is in risk group 1 and will be genetically modified then containment level one procedures must be
adhered to.
Note: If it is deemed to be in hazard group 2 or higher then this organism cannot be used in the London biohackspace laboratory.
The PI should understand the difference between the HG groups and be able to explain why the organism falls into HG1 and
not higher.
7.1.7 The principal investigator should also assess the risks to the environment involved with the organism. Particularly, genetically
modified organisms developed in the lab should not be allowed to leave the definied containment area in case of the risk of becoming
introduced to the wider environment where they may have an impact on either the ecosystem or health of the community.
7.1.7.1 Consider, for example, the capacity of a GM plant to survive and become established and deseminate. Including its ability to
compete with or displace other plants.
The PI should consider the hazards associated with inserted genetic elements, particularly if this codes for any toxic products
that might affect the ecosystem or animal health.
7.1.7.2 The PI should also consider the potential for transfer of genetic material between the GM plant and other organisms.
7.2 Asessing the risks involved in the use of chemicals and reagents.
7.2.1 The principal investigator should check whether a required chemical or reagent for their project is already in use in the laboratory.
If not they should locate the relavent MSDS for the substance in question and should pay particular attention to the following factors:
i) How should the substance be handled? Is particular PPE required, and is this available?
ii) How is the substance stored and can this be accommodated in the laboratory? For example, it may not be practical to store highly
volatile, flammable, corrosive or controlled substances on site.
iii) How should the substance be disposed of? Primarily, can this be disposed of down the drain (diluted or undiluted?) or are special
disposal measures required? If so are these available?
7.3 Assessing the risks involved in the use of instrumentation and equipment
7.3.1 The principal investigator should assess any risk presented by instrumentation or equipment brought into the lab for the purpose of
carrying out this project.
Some examples might be: does it operate at high temperature or pressure, produce wavelengths of light that might be harmful (i.e uses
lasers or UV bulbs), does it operate at high voltages (e.g electroporator),produce high frequency sounds that might be damaging to
hearing (e.g sonicators) or might be heavy or awkward to operate.
7.3.2 The principal investigator should check the SOP documentation for information covering similar devices, and the information covering the
laboratory safety induction which should cover most of the installed devices at the time of writing.
8. Resources
HSE docs on risk (in general and GMM stuff)
...
