Difference between revisions of "Biohacking Code of Conduct"

From London Hackspace Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reading links)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
= Reading links=
 
= Reading links=
 
* Our own Biohacking Resources section: http://wiki.hackspace.org.uk/wiki/Biohacking#Resources
 
* Our own Biohacking Resources section: http://wiki.hackspace.org.uk/wiki/Biohacking#Resources
* Links from DIYbio http://diybio.org/codes (about the event itself) http://diybio.org/safety (about how to esablish guide lines)  
+
* Links from DIYbio http://diybio.org/codes (about the event itself) http://diybio.org/safety (about how to esablish guide lines)
  
  
 +
* This is worth a look, too: a US "presidential commission" reports on DIYBio movement in the US http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101216/full/news.2010.680.html
 +
* Some notes on the relationship between the AAAS, FBI and DIYBio: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6012/1766.full#sec-3
  
 
 
 
=Notes=
 
=Notes=
 
* Cathy the Hackspace ethicist has offered her help.
 
* Cathy the Hackspace ethicist has offered her help.

Revision as of 13:54, 7 April 2011

We have been invited to give our views on a possible DIYBio code of conduct. http://groups.google.com/group/london-hack-space/browse_thread/thread/e5f41cdda8b7146b/bbd26dcba4761a4b?lnk=gst&q=diybio#bbd26dcba4761a4b

This page is used to gather reading material and start a discussion.

Reading links


Notes

  • Cathy the Hackspace ethicist has offered her help.

Discussion

  • GILDA: our representatives should be scientists and/or people who already have practical experience of biohacking. We shouldn't be represented by anyone who will talk about perceived or imagined problems.