Project:Blood typing

From London Hackspace Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

How genes code for blood group

Blood group is determined by the combination of A and B antigens in your red blood cells. A and B individuals have only their respective corresponding antigens, AB individuals have both, and O individuals have none.

The production of these antigens is determined by the "histo-blood group ABO system transferase" gene (1062 base pairs), which is part of the ABO gene locus. This gene codes for the expression of a glycosyltransferase enzyme which by acting on another antigen(H), produces A or B antigens. The A and B allelic forms of the gene code for different forms of glycosyltransferase which affect the H antigen in different ways. O alleles code for another protein that doesn't affect the H antigen, meaning no A or B antigens are expressed. O alleles have a deletion of G at 258, while B alleles have a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) from G to A at position 700. The gene we're looking at is here: ABO gene. You need to set the origin to 29 under the tools menu, as this viewer is for the entire ABO gene; the histo-blood group ABO system transferase gene doesn't start until position 29.

Each person has two of these alleles, one from each parent. A and B are dominant, O is recessive, so the possible combinations are:

Alleles Blood group
AA A
AO A
BB B
BO B
AB AB
OO O

In the UK the distribution of A, B, AB and O is 42%, 10%, 4% and 44%.

Process overview

1) Obtain two sequences of DNA through PCR, the first containing the deletion site at 258, and the second containing the SNP site at 700

2) Use restriction enzyme KpnI on the first fragment to cut the O alleles only, and use restriction enzyme AluI on the second fragment to cut the B alleles only. (KpnI's cutting site is GGTAC^C - this sequence is found in 0 alleles, but in A and B alleles the sequence is GGTGACC, hence they are not cut. AluI's cutting site is AG^CT - in A and O alleles the initial A is a G, hence only B alleles are cut.)

3) Do gel electrophoresis on the resulting fragments, hopefully resulting in distinguishable bands to show the 6 different alleles. We should then be able to determine an individual's blood type.

Process reality

Much of the necessary equipment we already have from the sex typing experiments. Of the new things, we need the restriction enzymes, and possible a new gel - see below.

All fragments in the papers are between 80 and 200 bp long. For this we would need a polyacrylamide gel (which we have decided against due to difficulty with handling) or a high quality agarose concentrated at 3%, which is a bit expensive, but not impossible. So we have decided to design our own primers to get larger fragments to work with.

Design of primers for larger fragments:

Using the ApE software, we have found a set of primers to enable us to use longer fragments. Here is the file with the primer sequences (Save this link as a file): ApE file, and Download ApE here

Primers for G deletion sequence:

Primer Sequence Length GC% Tm(°C)
P1 forward 17484 5' CCCGCAGGTCCAATGTTGAG 3' 17503 20 60 59
P1 reverse 18268 5' ATCTGACAGAGAAGTGACCACG 3' 18247 22 50 58

Product is 784bp. After digestion with KpnI you get two sizes of fragments - 243bp and 541bp


Primers for G to A SNP:

Primer Sequence Length GC% Tm(°C)
P2 forward 19125 5' GAGGTGGATTACCTGGTGTGC 3' 19145 21 57 59
P2 reverse 19473 5' GCACCTTGGTGGGTTTGTGG 3' 19454 20 60 60

Product: 347 bp After digestion with AluI : two fragment sizes of 96 bp and 251 bp

New equipment

Sigma aldrich have KpnI and AluI. I couldn't find them on NBS bio. A cheaper alternative is to try to get them from NEB (http://www.neb.uk.com/).

If we do need high quality agarose here is sigma's selection. NBSbio have agarose but no info on its purity.

Sources

Most of the procedure came from this paper. With some more here. For other papers and background see here.

Here is a sequence viewer for the ABO gene. Histo-blood group ABO system transferase starts at position 28 - so to find the deletion at 258 and the SNP at 700 you have to add 28 to the numbers on the viewer. Go from the 5' end.

Extraction and PCR 15/8

  • Extract DNA (two samples, Will and Nicholas) from cheek by rubbing with pipette tip and taking saliva
  • Mix with 250ul of chelex 100, cover with a drop of oil and incubate at 56°C for 30 mins.
  • Centrifuge for 5 mins and remove supernatant. Supernatant kept to view genomic DNA later.
  • Two reactions prepared - Nicolas (AMELX/Y primers), Will (PB1 primers)
  • Reaction volume - 12.5ul Taq, 5ul template, 5ul primers, 2.5ul deionised water.
  • PCR: initial denaturation at 96°C for 5 mins, then 35 cycles of 96°C for 1 min, annealing at 55° for 30 secs, extension at 72°C for 1 min.
  • Results. PCR failed. Will's DNA was the one using blood typing primers.

Extraction and electrophoresis of genomic DNA 15-17/8

  • Add cheek scraping + saliva to 1/2 a PCR tube of chelex (half bead layer, half liquid layer). Mix
  • Incubate at 56°C for 30 mins, vortex briefly, 94°C for 10 mins. (Should have centrifuged and) take supernatant.
  • Add 5ul of loading buffer to 25ul of template - visualise on 1% agarose gel
  • DNA visible in well.

Extraction and PCR 03/10

  • About 2ul of saliva scraped from cheek + 325ul chelex (half bead layer, half liquid layer). Mix.
  • Incubate at 56°C for 30 mins (missed vortex), 94°C for 10 mins. Centrifuge and take supernatant.
  • PCR mix: 5ul template, 5ul primers, 2.5ul dH20, 12.5ul Jumpstart taq readymix
  • Positive control: 1ul template, 5ul primers, 6.5ul dH20, 12.5ul Jumpstart taq readymix
  • PCR: 94C 2min, 30 cycles (94C 30s, 56C 30s, 72C 2min), 72C 5min.
Gel run 3rd Oct

From left:

  • 1: 250-10000bp ladder (from hackspace). Ladder key
  • 2: Positive control PCR product.
  • 3: Mike PCR product
  • 4: Simon PCR product
  • 5: Will PCR product
  • 6: MF1
  • 7: N.H / N.1+

The positive control worked (You can see if you look closely). However the band was significantly weaker than the gel run on August 20th with same PC + same primers. None of the PCRs on our extractions worked. I also ran our 3 genomic samples, and nothing was there - providing a reason for PCR failure.