Difference between revisions of "Project:Plant species testing"

From London Hackspace Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 69: Line 69:
 
*4: Isopropanol extraction from 30-31/7
 
*4: Isopropanol extraction from 30-31/7
 
*5: Sample of liquified pea with no other reagents added apart from autoclaved water.
 
*5: Sample of liquified pea with no other reagents added apart from autoclaved water.
 +
 +
 +
  
  

Revision as of 11:40, 13 October 2012

We aim to extract DNA from plants, then PCR out a sequence and run it on a gel to test and refine our DNA extraction / PCR technique. First project is to test for peas. Inspiration and primers are in this paper. We are using two methods of extraction. 1st attempt with a chelex protocol, 2nd with alcohol precipitation. If you're trying to repeat any of these and not sure about the procedure, see the links on the front page.

Chelex extraction method - 17 and 18/7/12

Extraction (From this paper - we also have full text available):

  • 'Homogenize' (mush) approx 40 mg pea with a pestle in 300ul of 5% chelex solution for 1 min
  • Finger vortex for 10s then boil for 5 mins, then vortex again for 10s. (Hot plate lost heat in the middle so we boiled for 8 mins)
  • Centrifuge for 1 min - recover supernatant and use as template

PCR:

  • Prepare sample with 12.5 ul of Taq ready mix, 2 ul of each primer, 3 ul of template, and 5.5 ul of dH20.
  • Denature at 96°C for 5 mins
  • 40 cycles of D = 96°C for one minute, A = 58°C for 30 seconds, E = 72°C for one minute.
  • Put paraffin on top after 5 mins (should have been before start)

Electrophoresis:

  • Electrophoresed for 1 hr on an 100ml 1% agarose gel - started at 80V, settled at around 130V
  • Visualised under UV light through orange filter - did not see any bands from the template, but ladder was visible, indicating PCR failed.

Repeat without PCR: 21/7/12

  • Extraction: same procedure, but started with approx 50 mg of pea in 600ul chelex. (This is much more reactant than in the paper and a waste of chelex, but our scale only goes down to 100mg. Would be good to get a smaller one.)
  • Electrophoresis: same procedure but used 0.5% instead of 1% agarose solution as we are running genomic DNA not PCR product.

Saw a faint, blurry band, running ahead of the ladder. Not sure what this is, as genomic DNA should be behind the ladder if not still in the well.

Repeat without PCR: 30/7/12

  • Bashed peas into paste in a glove
  • Placed a 1/2g of sample of template in 250 ul of chelex 5%
  • Incubated at 56°C for 30 mins, with periodic vortexing, the 94°C for 10 mins
  • 10 ul of supernatant visualised on 1% agarose gel, together with a sample containing only loading dye, a sample containing only chelex, and a sample from Will's first chelex extraction of 17/7.

Chelex only and loading dye only samples had no bands - so they are not contaminated with DNA. All pea samples showed a band running ahead of the ladder, becoming more diffuse over time. Conclusion: we think DNAses may be affecting the sample, cutting the DNA into small pieces.

Precipitation extraction method: 17/7/12, 24/7/12

  • Blend peas with salt and detergent according to this protocol. Sieve.
  • Incubate for 15 mins at 60°C (optional step that we didn't take)
  • Centrifuge - recover supernatant
  • Add proteinease K (100 ul of 1mg / ml solution to 300 ul of pea template) - incubate for 1 hr at 50C (action of proteinase k) then 94 C for 10 mins (inactivation of proteinase K)
  • Add 100% ethanol, store at -20° overnight (actually for a week) for DNA to precipitate
  • We observed white particles on the side of the tube which we assumed to be DNA, but no white strings, which is what we were expecting
  • Centrifuge for 30 mins to make DNA form pellet at bottom of tube. Unclear if pellet had formed, but removed supernatant and resuspended in H2O anyway.
  • Skipped PCR and ran genomic DNA on a 40mg agarose gel - as with chelex extraction, saw a faint blurry band running ahead of the ladder, and a small amount of stain in the well.

Conclusion: none of the runs prove we have DNA in the gel, indicating our extractions failed.

Repeat without PCR (30/7/12):

  • 2 peas liquified, a few grains of salt and a drop of washing up liquid added
  • Incubated at 56°C for 15 mins
  • Centrifuge for 5 mins - recover 80 ul of supernatant.
  • Add proteinease K (25 ul of 1mg / ml solution to 80 ul of pea template) - incubate at 50°C for 10 mins (action of proteinase k) then 94 C for 10 mins (inactivation of proteinase K)
  • Add 70% isopropanol, store at -20° overnight.
  • Centrifuge at 5000rpm for 40 mins. Isopropanol removed, pellet air dried for 20 mins, then resuspended in autoclaved H2O.
  • 23ul of sample + 2ul of loading dye/glycerol mix electrophoresed at 80V for 30 mins. No staining observed.
Gel run 10th sept

From right:

  • 1: 250-10000bp ladder (from hackspace). Ladder key
  • 2: Chelex extraction from 17/7
  • 3: Isopropanol extraction from 30-31/7
  • 4: Isopropanol extraction from 30-31/7
  • 5: Sample of liquified pea with no other reagents added apart from autoclaved water.








Conclusion: Isopropanol extractions failed because pellet contained too much plant matter - did not filter properly. Liquified pea gives an easily visible smear. Chelex extraction behaved as last time.

Repeat without PCR (1/8/12):

  • 5.3 grams of crushed pea added to 20ml of distilled, sterile water and a shake of salt. Solid removed and 3ml of detergent added
  • Shake of meat tenderiser added to break down proteins
  • Centrifuged and supernatant removed - solids discarded.
  • 5ml of 70% added to 10ml of template for precipitation
  • Interface removed and as much liquid as possible removed from this
  • Pellet dried at 60°C in thermocycler.
  • EDIT - what happened then...? No evidence on list.