10
edits
Assistive Music Technology: Difference between revisions
From London Hackspace Wiki
→Hackday Brief
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Some ideas that have occurred to our staff and musicians have been as follows: | Some ideas that have occurred to our staff and musicians have been as follows: | ||
I think being able to cycle through a range of sounds or samples is very useful. | * I think being able to cycle through a range of sounds or samples is very useful. | ||
Also, it’s great to have zero latency between press and hearing sound. | * Also, it’s great to have zero latency between press and hearing sound. | ||
Wireless/switches/velocity sensitive | * Wireless/switches/velocity sensitive | ||
Quick response when triggering switch repeatedly | * Quick response when triggering switch repeatedly | ||
Can use at least 8 switches | * Can use at least 8 switches | ||
Cross platform, compatible with software we use. | * Cross platform, compatible with software we use. | ||
Have choice to use as key commands (like crick) or midi (all in one) | * Have choice to use as key commands (like crick) or midi (all in one) | ||
Small/compact | * Small/compact | ||
Affordability off the shelf | * Affordability off the shelf | ||
That it has the capacity to interpret expression rather than just on/off messages | * That it has the capacity to interpret expression rather than just on/off messages | ||
== Open Hack Brief == | == Open Hack Brief == | ||
