10
edits
Assistive Music Technology: Difference between revisions
From London Hackspace Wiki
→Hackday Brief
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Some ideas that have occurred to our staff and musicians have been as follows: | Some ideas that have occurred to our staff and musicians have been as follows: | ||
* I think being able to cycle through a range of sounds or samples is very useful. | |||
* Also, it’s great to have zero latency between press and hearing sound. | |||
* Wireless/switches/velocity sensitive | |||
* Quick response when triggering switch repeatedly | |||
* Can use at least 8 switches | |||
* Cross platform, compatible with software we use. | |||
* Have choice to use as key commands (like crick) or midi (all in one) | |||
* Small/compact | |||
* Affordability off the shelf | |||
* That it has the capacity to interpret expression rather than just on/off messages | |||
== Open Hack Brief == | == Open Hack Brief == | ||
